Russia had zero justification. Period.Read history, it aint woke and btw no state needs to give you or me excuses to act.
"During the Iraq war, the Bush administration justified its pre-emptive military strike against Iraq on grounds of national security. The strike, carried out under the administration's National Security Strategy, asserts the right of the USA to take unilateral military action against rogue states and terrorist organizations so as to prevent or mitigate a presumed attack by such nations or organizations against the United States."
Who exactly is a rogue state or terrorist organization? That its purely determined by the perceived threat.
There are plenty of papers online that discuss the negative aspects of this doctrine but might is right out in the real world.
Thank you. It's easy when faced with 2 Russian trolls. So here goes another: Putin, your boys are taking a hell of a beating out there.
So motorbike, presumably you are another expat who ran away from Russia because everything is so rosy over there? At least you'll be spared the Russian economy collapsing (the thing that russian propagandists claim is happening in the west but us actually happening in Rus
I cant argue with that, but it does raise a question; does a state need justification to wage a war? If you view war as an extension of the political process then it's goal is to assert your position over the opposition. Thats the bit I am interested in and also how ineffective the West has been given our supposed superiority in everything and now broken Russia is.Russia had zero justification. Period.
I love how you idiots think this is a “liberal” thing. I hate to break it to you, but there are plenty of us conservatives who think the idiots who buy into Trump or Tucker’s bullshit are a fucking embarrassment. You’re spouting out their talking points like a well trained little poodle.Is this where you liberals have got to, any challenge of the narrative no matter how mild is framed into strawman ad hominems?
At no point have I said that support one side or another, even that is an affront because your liberal values demand that I do. What I have said is that wars happen between states end of story, my personal opinion is that UKR will not win this. That is obviously a big problem for you that I do not conform to your groupthink. This thread has more in common with sports fans from the same team in a bar celebrating before full time. It may be fun but nothing they do is going to alter the outcome.
This is somewhat of an overstatement. Supply of arms has allowed Ukraine to significantly reduce Russia's territorial gains.I cant argue with that, but it does raise a question; does a state need justification to wage a war? If you view war as an extension of the political process then it's goal is to assert your position over the opposition. Thats the bit I am interested in and also how ineffective the West has been given our supposed superiority in everything and now broken Russia is.
...
At no point have I said that I support one side or another...
Your statement Ukraine will not "win" this indicates you suffer from the same sports-thought disorder. This stuff is not anywhere near as simple. What "win" means in this mess can be a lot of things for both parties, and a negotiated settlements can make both sides winners and losers at the same time in matters of war.Is this where you liberals have got to, any challenge of the narrative no matter how mild is framed into strawman ad hominems?
At no point have I said that I support one side or another, even that is an affront because your liberal values demand that I do. What I have said is that wars happen between states end of story, my personal opinion is that UKR will not win this. That is obviously a big problem for you that I do not conform to your groupthink. This thread has more in common with sports fans from the same team in a bar celebrating before full time. It may be fun but nothing they do is going to alter the outcome. (unless they enter the field which no one here is going to do)
When you use the term "you liberals" it kind of makes it clear as to which team you are support. There is no demand that you reveal what side you support because you already have. It's harder to figure what sock this is.Is this where you liberals have got to, any challenge of the narrative no matter how mild is framed into strawman ad hominems?
At no point have I said that I support one side or another, even that is an affront because your liberal values demand that I do. What I have said is that wars happen between states end of story, my personal opinion is that UKR will not win this. That is obviously a big problem for you that I do not conform to your groupthink. This thread has more in common with sports fans from the same team in a bar celebrating before full time. It may be fun but nothing they do is going to alter the outcome. (unless they enter the field which no one here is going to do)
You raise a good point, what does win mean? Eventually both sides will come to an agreement and both will claim to have "won" unfortunately there are no winners here but a lot of losers. The citizens of UKR in other words who take the brunt of this until an agreement is reached.Your statement Ukraine will not "win" this indicates you suffer from the same sports-thought disorder. This stuff is not anywhere near as simple. What "win" means in this mess can be a lot of things for both parties, and a negotiated settlements can make both sides winners and losers at the same time in matters of war.
Regardless of the outcome, Russia is now an international pariah and will no longer be a trusted or respected member of the international community, if they ever were. I will no longer purchase Russian products or associate with Russians who support the war, or stood by and did nothing. I suspect there are millions more who think the same. It will be a long time before Russian athletes are competing in international sport - we have seen our last Russian Grand Prix, for example. More importantly, they will no longer be able to sell energy to Europe in the volume they did in the past, the EU has learned the lesson on dependence on an unreliable supplier.You raise a good point, what does win mean? Eventually both sides will come to an agreement and both will claim to have "won" unfortunately there are no winners here but a lot of losers. The citizens of UKR in other words who take the brunt of this until an agreement is reached.
Exactly. Its worthwhile recapping this below. The Baltic states have been warning for some time and even now Macron doesn't seem to understandRegardless of the outcome, Russia is now an international pariah and will no longer be a trusted or respected member of the international community, if they ever were. I will no longer purchase Russian products or associate with Russians who support the war, or stood by and did nothing. I suspect there are millions more who think the same. It will be a long time before Russian athletes are competing in international sport - we have seen our last Russian Grand Prix, for example. More importantly, they will no longer be able to sell energy to Europe in the volume they did in the past, the EU has learned the lesson on dependence on an unreliable supplier.
While Ukraine is taking significant damage now, they can and will rebuild, because the West will help. The damage to Russia's economy and international reputation will take generations to repair, and they will have to do it without help from the West. Unless democracy comes to Russia, their reputation is permanently damaged.
Moreover, there is no solution without Ukraine in NATO going forward. The irony is Russia asking for security guarantees. What good were the security guarantees Russia gave Ukraine?
Is this where you liberals have got to, any challenge of the narrative no matter how mild is framed into strawman ad hominems?
At no point have I said that I support one side or another, even that is an affront because your liberal values demand that I do. What I have said is that wars happen between states end of story, my personal opinion is that UKR will not win this. That is obviously a big problem for you that I do not conform to your groupthink. This thread has more in common with sports fans from the same team in a bar celebrating before full time. It may be fun but nothing they do is going to alter the outcome. (unless they enter the field which no one here is going to do)
This could end up with the russian military refusing to fight like what happened once before which led to the collapse of the USSR. Some of my customers are from the Ukraine and they seem adamant about remaining a sovereign nation without connections with Russia.Regardless of the outcome, Russia is now an international pariah and will no longer be a trusted or respected member of the international community, if they ever were. I will no longer purchase Russian products or associate with Russians who support the war, or stood by and did nothing. I suspect there are millions more who think the same. It will be a long time before Russian athletes are competing in international sport - we have seen our last Russian Grand Prix, for example. More importantly, they will no longer be able to sell energy to Europe in the volume they did in the past, the EU has learned the lesson on dependence on an unreliable supplier.
While Ukraine is taking significant damage now, they can and will rebuild, because the West will help. The damage to Russia's economy and international reputation will take generations to repair, and they will have to do it without help from the West. Unless democracy comes to Russia, their reputation is permanently damaged.
Moreover, there is no solution without Ukraine in NATO going forward. The irony is Russia asking for security guarantees. What good were the security guarantees Russia gave Ukraine?
Agree with the general sentiment but just as I have been consistently concerned for the UKR population above all else, there is also a reason to be concerned for the RU population if/once the sanctions bite hard.Regardless of the outcome, Russia is now an international pariah and will no longer be a trusted or respected member of the international community, if they ever were. I will no longer purchase Russian products or associate with Russians who support the war, or stood by and did nothing. I suspect there are millions more who think the same. It will be a long time before Russian athletes are competing in international sport - we have seen our last Russian Grand Prix, for example. More importantly, they will no longer be able to sell energy to Europe in the volume they did in the past, the EU has learned the lesson on dependence on an unreliable supplier.
While Ukraine is taking significant damage now, they can and will rebuild, because the West will help. The damage to Russia's economy and international reputation will take generations to repair, and they will have to do it without help from the West. Unless democracy comes to Russia, their reputation is permanently damaged.
Moreover, there is no solution without Ukraine in NATO going forward. The irony is Russia asking for security guarantees. What good were the security guarantees Russia gave Ukraine?
It's pretty easy to see outcomes that might be called a "win" for NATO.You raise a good point, what does win mean? Eventually both sides will come to an agreement and both will claim to have "won" unfortunately there are no winners here but a lot of losers.