dogwatch
Super Anarchist
The winged keel was all about the 12M rule. Why would you expect to see it "over time"?
I assumed that it provided some benefit (not related to the rule) to the speed/pointing ability of the boat and therefore one could expect it would provide a similar benefit in other classes.The winged keel was all about the 12M rule. Why would you expect to see it "over time"?
Don't know the details, but evidently several boats were subsequently built with wings and all the details that too advantage of there being wings. US 61 went a different way, with a bulb, two rudders aft, and a forward canard. Who knows what they'd be doing if they kept building 12s...Said another way would be have the rules outlawed the winged keel or is it not that effective?
YesThe winged keel was all about the 12M rule. Why would you expect to see it "over time"?
Who knows what they'd be doing if they kept building 12s...
So interpreting these two responses, it could be that the winged keel was only an advantage under that 12M rule. For example if there was a limit on draft but the wings provided more righting moment at that draft limit. Do I have it right?
That's a good example. Lots of shoal-draft boats have been built with wings around that logic.The winged keel was all about the 12M rule. Why would you expect to see it "over time"?
Who knows what they'd be doing if they kept building 12s...
So interpreting these two responses, it could be that the winged keel was only an advantage under that 12M rule. For example if there was a limit on draft but the wings provided more righting moment at that draft limit. Do I have it right?
So interpreting these two responses, it could be that the winged keel was only an advantage under that 12M rule. For example if there was a limit on draft but the wings provided more righting moment at that draft limit. Do I have it right?
The winged keel was only a factor. Often underplayed or forgotten altogether was Tom Schnakenberg's sails and of course the huge and unprecedented level of training and preparation the crew of A2 went through.The implication was that the winged keel was the difference in the race but we have not really seen that over time, have we?
Yacht Club bar theory from after USA lost: Given that Australia lost the first two races due to equipment failure, did Conner have a psychological handicap that he knew Australia was faster and failed to cover to confirm that bias?Yes
Though it is noticeable that had Conner covered in that last race, he would have certainly won. So how much was the winged keel? They were stronger in heavier wind, US were stronger in lighter
The whole Australia II (A-II) package was incredible, from Benbobs innovation, Bertrands determination, Schnackenberg’s sails, Bondy’s money & foresight, plus a dedicated, talented and thoroughly professional crew.The winged keel was only a factor. Often underplayed or forgotten altogether was Tom Schnakenberg's sails and of course the huge and unprecedented level of training and preparation the crew of A2 went through.
Thanks SS for the heads up on The Challenge, never knew about it.I have finally watched "Untold". In reality there wasn't much that was untold. To get a much fuller picture you should read 'No Excuse to Lose' by DC and 'Born to Win' by JB. There is also a dramatized documentary done not long after '83 called 'The Challenge', a mini series which is a really good watch. I have just checked and somebody put it up on Youtube a couple of years ago. Worth a watch.
See ya on the water
SS
And America was whiter. Right asshole?I've always gravitated to the higher performance boats myself, but the America's cup was better back then in the 12 meters.