Way to promote being the first non binary official.

[The Joker]

It's almost like you can't simply name the people "making excuses".

And, you said that with such authority and confidence.

I guess we'll never know if it's bullshit.

Of course, the likely reason for your refusal is you don't want to state who, as someone will mock you for your claim. You don't want to share what your standard is for "making excuses", because it is likely laughable.

No the bullshit is you are either blind or deliberately lying anyone can read the thread and see posters claiming it was a mistake, grabbed the wrong bag, Not convicted or charged no proof it was intentional ect

 

[Marty Gingras]

;-)

 

[Bus Driver]

No the bullshit is you are either blind or deliberately lying anyone can read the thread and see posters claiming it was a mistake, grabbed the wrong bag, Not convicted or charged no proof it was intentional ect

The vast majority of this thread is folks losing their shit over pronouns and how Brinton presents. Hell, most of the comments about the alleged theft indicate it should be investigated and Brinton should be charged, if warranted. If charged and tried, a conviction may be appropriate. That is the sequence of how these things are supposed to go. It's like you have no fucking clue about Due Process.

The folks who spoke of mistakenly taking the wrong bag were sharing personal anecdotes about how they had done so.

Somehow, you see that as "making excuses".

If you are good with a conviction before a charge, does that apply to people who illegally possess Top Secret files?

 

[Voyageur]

which crime is worse?

 

[Peter Andersen]

The puppy play is really putting the zap on your head. It's interesting to see people's reactions to culturally taboo things. While it seems kind of weird to me it does not seem like a deal breaker for a job. If they are convicted of being a thief that's a different story of course

The men who live as dogs: 'We're just the same as any person on the high street'

Human pups like to live in packs, play with squeaky toys, eat from bowls and nuzzle their ‘handlers’. Ahead of a new documentary, Spot, Bootbrush and Kaz open up about their community

www.theguardian.com

You cant even get that right. It dosnt want to act like a dog. It wants to fuck a dog

 

[Voyageur]

You cant even get that right. It dosnt want to act like a dog. It wants to fuck a dog

are you saying doggy style is bad? you are an incel, methinks.

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

Crime should be prosecuted. There is a system for it.

 

[Marty Gingras]

Propriety Police are afoot.

 

[Clove Hitch]

You cant even get that right. It dosnt want to act like a dog. It wants to fuck a dog

No. They want to fuck people dressed up as dogs

 

[Bus Driver]

Crime should be prosecuted. There is a system for it.

There you go. Making a non-excuse.

 

[Steam Flyer]

You cant even get that right. It dosnt want to act like a dog. It wants to fuck a dog

No. They want to fuck people dressed up as dogs

Might be considered too fine a distinction, to some.

 

[Clove Hitch]

Might be considered too fine a distinction, to some.

Some people certainly seem confused so let me post something that will explain this dog fucking once and for all

 

[Peter Andersen]

Some people certainly seem confused so let me post something that will explain this dog fucking once and for all

I wouldn't hire a robot dog fucker either.

 

[Voyageur]

I wouldn't hire a robot dog fucker either.

it wouldn't work for you either. what is it that you hire people to do?

 

[Danceswithoctopus]

it wouldn't work for you either. what is it that you hire people to do?

Walk his dog--hence his reluctance to hire dog-fuckers.

 

[Blue Crab]

If/when "they" get fired, there won't be a discrimination suit. Winning.

 

[Danceswithoctopus]

If/when "they" get fired, there won't be a discrimination suit. Winning.

Just for sake of agreement, shouldn't it be: "If/when 'they' gets fired . . . ."? Because in this case, "they" is singular.

You're welcome for the confusion.

 

[Blue Crab]

Just for sake of agreement, shouldn't it be: "If/when 'they' gets fired . . . ."? Because in this case, "they" is singular.

You're welcome for the confusion.

Is this a great country or what?

 

[βhyde]

230+ posts and not a single person has asked the most blatantly obvious question in this whole kerfuffle. What the hell is a $2,300 Vera Bradley suitcase doing at the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport? Fuck, I'd steal it.

 

[Raz'r]

230+ posts and not a single person has asked the most blatantly obvious question in this whole kerfuffle. What the hell is a $2,300 Vera Bradley suitcase doing at the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport? Fuck, I'd steal it.

And who checks one!