• The Forum will be unavailable on March 27, 2023 from 8:AM to 12:00 PM EST for maintenance.

What brands from the 70s/80s would you resurrect?

MauiPunter

Will sail for food
They do. Still have my investing cast S/S Barients. Probably go through a thermal nuclear event with these. But I really use them for drink holders now!  

View attachment 294196
I have some massive electric Barients on my boat too.

10308064_10153362372639251_2839656690019888062_n.jpg


(not my kids, friends of the family)

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rain Man

Super Anarchist
7,609
2,375
Wet coast.
A remember that as the original Dash's had a problem with cavitation with the rudder. I had sailed these early and you got hit by a big gust and you helm went for a shit. No steering. I think Laurie made mention (more muttering under his breath) of that at one point that the rudder wasn't his design. I think most did a retrofit as it was a little scary without it. I guess Finn "did it his way!". The whole program was done for cost "effective" as they did a pile of them at once. I think dash 34's boat was the second owner.   
The rudder is a NACA 0013 with the aft end narrowing to the trailing edge about 4" short of where it should be.  I suspect it was 0013 instead of a standard 0012 to allow a bigger shaft and higher angles of attack without stalling.  To make it balance they shortened it in the fore and aft direction, deviating from the proper foil shape in the process.  No surprise that flow separates in an unfriendly manner.  I learned not to fight it past a couple of quick pumps, just let it round up, get the flow re-attached and try again.   While most have retrofit, the rating penalty was significant.  Make a few too many mods and you have a turbo Dash rating 68 no matter if the boat actually sails to it.

Mine is #10.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

LarryE

Anarchist
664
29
Florida
Jeebus peeps, ya gotta bring back some (but not all) of the S2's  -  7.9 and 9.1 at least  . . 

They were almost ready to do another run of the 7.9's in the early 2,000's but the Dubya econ meltdown put the Kibash on it. 

Another reason to hate GOPPERS . . . . as if you needed one. 

These boats are going on 50 years old !! How many sailing craft can match that? 

View attachment 294200
The 7.9 was my first thought.

Can't think of much I would change. Wanted to get a new boat for some time. Keep coming back back to why?  It's the purfect boat for us.

 

McGyver

Anarchist
816
54
San Diego
Choate's

Aluminum Frers' 50

Bloopers

Having two crewmembers, when tacking,  next to the new leeward shroud, grabbing the clew of the #1, running with it, almost falling on the deck block, and seeing the smile of the grinders who would NOT have to cough up their lungs grinding those huge, heavy motherfuckers.

 

Loose Cannon

Super Anarchist
1,236
65
Planet Earth
(Helpful link added.)

CSY because they were made to be difficult for idiots to break. Last I saw, Com-Pac still has the 44 hull mold. I don't think anyone can afford to put as much fiberglass as CSY did though.
Got my charter writ on one of those, it was like sailing a bus.  Probably could have parked it on a reef, floated off at high tide and kept on going.

yes, there were a lot of early fiberglass boats that were heavy but unbreakable.

 

J28

Super Anarchist
2,307
109
Jeebus peeps, ya gotta bring back some (but not all) of the S2's  -  7.9 and 9.1 at least  . . 

They were almost ready to do another run of the 7.9's in the early 2,000's but the Dubya econ meltdown put the Kibash on it. 

Another reason to hate GOPPERS . . . . as if you needed one. 

These boats are going on 50 years old !! How many sailing craft can match that? 

View attachment 294200
Oliver You are a full-on asshole with your statement about not needing a reason to hate Republicans. 

Q:  What gets ruined when politics are brought into a discussion?

A:  Everything

So take your political views and shove 'em up you ass.

 

Great Red Shark

Super Anarchist
8,485
696
Honolulu
Gotta love the ability of some to see EVERYTHING through a distorted partisan lens.   Take a moment to consider what you are about to spout in response,  and then Just Fucking Don't,  eh ?

Tax implications notwithstanding - and they surely didn't do any "luxury" manufacturers any favors,  the FACT remains that boat registrations in the US peaked in 1981.

I think the decline of the sailing scene and the downfall of the makers is/was as much demographic as fiscal - and the monetary ramifications of rising costs of labor, real estate and petrochemicals are hard to rightly blame on any one party.

In Spurr's book he takes considerable lengths to explain how NOBODY can simply "pop out" a boat.  A hull,  yeah - sure but the completion of a boat is a much more complex/costly operation that is/was frequently insufficiently appreciated, by both makers and buyers.  Combine THAT with the matter that the "mass market"  (everything gets compared to the Auto makers) really just doesn't exist and you have business models that lose money on every boat, and try to make it up with volume that isn't there.    This is a poor financial plan.  I have a business degree,  trust me on that.

The market just isn't that big.  Not car big,  not even motorcycle big.  Face it boys,  there are more people in the US that identify as bird-watchers than sailors.

Boat brands I like to see making an amazing re-appearance:  Express 27s and Moore 24s - and don't change a damn thing.

You can bring back the Hotfoot 27 if you must, but it really could use some updates - and what WOULD any of them really cost/sell for now ?

Much as I would love to see a modern production of my beloved Sonoma 30, I have to think a new one would be $ 60 grand, for the barest of boats, with no trailer,  pushing $100 nicely finished - right in the range of the Seascape27/FarEast28 - which are about as big, heavy & complex as the 1981 Sonoma (which were made in Petaluma, - marketing...).   I'm shocked.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

some dude

Super Anarchist
4,177
171
Boat brands I like to see making an amazing re-appearance:  Express 27s and Moore 24s - and don't change a damn thing.

You can bring back the Hotfoot 27 if you must, but it really could use some updates - and what WOULD any of them really cost/sell for now ?

Much as I would love to see a modern production of my beloved Sonoma 30, I have to think a new one would be $ 60 grand, for the barest of boats, with no trailer,  pushing $100 nicely finished - right in the range of the Seascape27/FarEast28 - which are about as big, heavy & complex as the 1981 Sonoma (which were made in Petaluma, - marketing...).   I'm shocked.
Exactly.  You could order a brand new Moore 24 today(and God  bless anyone who does) but it will cost about 4x what a well sorted race ready one will cost you.  Fiberglass lasts forever and that's both good and bad news.  People talk about resurrecting Ericson, but a perfectly good Ericson 35 will run you maybe $25K.  Want one? Go buy one.  But to crank the factory back up?  Your price point will be a bit higher.

 

Great Red Shark

Super Anarchist
8,485
696
Honolulu
As for the viability of any of this,  may we please recall the re-introduction efforts of the Tartan10 and Hobie33 - both with strong constituencies, one might think.

Perhaps 'Cruisy-er' is the answer - since performance sailors will always naturally want newer designs.

I always thought the Sabre 30 represented a heck of a lot of boat for the money - they sail just fine, too - and here we address another point made in the pages of 'Heart of Glass',  which is that you end up competing with all of your own old boats on the used market because fiberglass boats just don't seem to wear out.

Just go look at what you can buy a nicer mid-80s Sabre 30 for on the used market and then ask what it would cost to make one in the town you live in today, nevermind the equipment.

Edit:   I swear, Some dude and I hit SAVE at the same moment !

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top