I have some massive electric Barients on my boat too.They do. Still have my investing cast S/S Barients. Probably go through a thermal nuclear event with these. But I really use them for drink holders now!
View attachment 294196
The rudder is a NACA 0013 with the aft end narrowing to the trailing edge about 4" short of where it should be. I suspect it was 0013 instead of a standard 0012 to allow a bigger shaft and higher angles of attack without stalling. To make it balance they shortened it in the fore and aft direction, deviating from the proper foil shape in the process. No surprise that flow separates in an unfriendly manner. I learned not to fight it past a couple of quick pumps, just let it round up, get the flow re-attached and try again. While most have retrofit, the rating penalty was significant. Make a few too many mods and you have a turbo Dash rating 68 no matter if the boat actually sails to it.A remember that as the original Dash's had a problem with cavitation with the rudder. I had sailed these early and you got hit by a big gust and you helm went for a shit. No steering. I think Laurie made mention (more muttering under his breath) of that at one point that the rudder wasn't his design. I think most did a retrofit as it was a little scary without it. I guess Finn "did it his way!". The whole program was done for cost "effective" as they did a pile of them at once. I think dash 34's boat was the second owner.
The 7.9 was my first thought.Jeebus peeps, ya gotta bring back some (but not all) of the S2's - 7.9 and 9.1 at least . .
They were almost ready to do another run of the 7.9's in the early 2,000's but the Dubya econ meltdown put the Kibash on it.
Another reason to hate GOPPERS . . . . as if you needed one.
These boats are going on 50 years old !! How many sailing craft can match that?
View attachment 294200
Got my charter writ on one of those, it was like sailing a bus. Probably could have parked it on a reef, floated off at high tide and kept on going.(Helpful link added.)
CSY because they were made to be difficult for idiots to break. Last I saw, Com-Pac still has the 44 hull mold. I don't think anyone can afford to put as much fiberglass as CSY did though.
Oliver You are a full-on asshole with your statement about not needing a reason to hate Republicans.Jeebus peeps, ya gotta bring back some (but not all) of the S2's - 7.9 and 9.1 at least . .
They were almost ready to do another run of the 7.9's in the early 2,000's but the Dubya econ meltdown put the Kibash on it.
Another reason to hate GOPPERS . . . . as if you needed one.
These boats are going on 50 years old !! How many sailing craft can match that?
View attachment 294200
Take your bullshit to PA, you fucking cunt.Hey J28 -
Yeah, FOX learned ya that the meltdown was all Barney Frank's fault, right?
Go straight to hades, you Reichista punk.
We're still waiting to hear about your boat.Go easy on him. He is a sad case.
Mee-yow!We're still waiting to hear about your boat.
Or does it exist in the same world as your sex life?
Exactly. You could order a brand new Moore 24 today(and God bless anyone who does) but it will cost about 4x what a well sorted race ready one will cost you. Fiberglass lasts forever and that's both good and bad news. People talk about resurrecting Ericson, but a perfectly good Ericson 35 will run you maybe $25K. Want one? Go buy one. But to crank the factory back up? Your price point will be a bit higher.Boat brands I like to see making an amazing re-appearance: Express 27s and Moore 24s - and don't change a damn thing.
You can bring back the Hotfoot 27 if you must, but it really could use some updates - and what WOULD any of them really cost/sell for now ?
Much as I would love to see a modern production of my beloved Sonoma 30, I have to think a new one would be $ 60 grand, for the barest of boats, with no trailer, pushing $100 nicely finished - right in the range of the Seascape27/FarEast28 - which are about as big, heavy & complex as the 1981 Sonoma (which were made in Petaluma, - marketing...). I'm shocked.