Why was this massive Trump scandal hiding in plain sight for 28 months?

[Nice!]

Google is not to be trusted.
They are corrupt and amoral.
They scrub the truth in favor of NWO narratives

Is that what Fox News told you?

 

[veni vidi vici]

Is that what Fox News told you?

No , conservative or story outside of the mainstream media dogmatic line is buried

 

[Nice!]

No , conservative or story outside of the mainstream media dogmatic line is buried

So is the meaning of this incomplete sentence.

 

[Blue Crab]

It really means a lot to Vi.

 

[Expat Canuck]

Google is not to be trusted.
They are corrupt and amoral.
They scrub the truth in favor of NWO narratives

If (and that is a very big if!), what you say is true, then why hasn't Elon, or some other right leaning techno-geek released a search engine that does NOT "scrub the truth" and instead returns all hits on a given subject? It's not like there is anything particularly magical about search engines (anymore).
It there IS a search engine that exists that does not "scrub the truth" as Google does, why do you not use it to demonstrate what Google is hiding?

 

[Blue Crab]

This fits right here:

Did I misrember this? I thought Trump pardoned Manafort, along with a whole bunch of other crooked amoral operators.....

Here's the start of this BB. I commented about Manafort in prison. And cited it as "read and learn." You thought that was incorrect, I guess, and asked the above when it would not have taken you 20 more seconds to google it yourself with the handy link provided. I really don't get that and you're always the first guy to need an explanation on almost everything. I expect more from Mensa-rated folk.

Anyhow, Steamer jumps in with some bias confirmation and ... et voila! [which as a foreign term should be italicized as shown] you guys give each other a bro hug ... and utterly missed the point. Is PA your primary news source? That was rhetorical.

You're absolutely right.
I'll wait until Adam shiff says so. Then it must be true! He has evidence!!!

Gotta laugh here. I'm sure Mr Schiff, an adult and experienced lawyer, passed on his evidence in an appropriate manner. That's not enough for ML. He wants a more revealing reveal like he's used to on Jerry Springer or Suckup Carlson. Man, yer a fucking idiot. Life is not talk radio. At least not for the North of 100 Club.

I realize my tone is harsh. I had a longish chat with some Thumpers today, as most days, but this one had a nausea-inducing ending. Utterly flabbergasted and then gobsmacked ... I asked the group:

1) if anyone knew or had heard of Leonard Leo?

Nope.

2) What's the groupthink on Citizens United v. FCC ?

"Was it a supreme court case?"*

There will be no "one nation, indivisible" until we all speak the same language. We're like 247 years old or so as a nation and in my view we've never been closer to bloody civil unrest than now. It won't be the Mason-Dixon line this time. It's simpler than that. The line is 100 IQ. The dummies south of the line have a god but I repeat myself.

* The one guy who had heard of it is CEO of a regional energy company. He sure isn't what most would call dumb. By the same token, he does not have an informed opinion.

 

[Bus Driver]

So is the meaning of this incomplete sentence.

I think the word you’re looking for is “gibberish”.

 

[Ishmael]

I think the word you’re looking for is “gibberish”.

Of the "frontier" variety.

 

[pusslicker]

Google is not to be trusted.
They are corrupt and amoral.
They scrub the truth in favor of NWO narratives

You criticize centrist, non-biased sources like NPR, CSMonitor and Reuters. Now a search engine that allows me to find anything including the pics from the house you don't live in is somehow corrupt and amoral. My question is what are the real sources I should be using? And why is it you are the only one smart enough to suss them out?

 

[MagentaLine]

You criticize centrist, non-biased sources like NPR, CSMonitor and Reuters. Now a search engine that allows me to find anything including the pics from the house you don't live in is somehow corrupt and amoral. My question is what are the real sources I should be using? And why is it you are the only one smart enough to suss them out?

Are you kidding? YouTube , owned by Google, didn't squash every covid video that didnr align itself when the pro vax not a lab leak agenda!? You're out of your gourd bro.

 

[pusslicker]

Are you kidding? YouTube , owned by Google, didn't squash every covid video that didnr align itself when the pro vax not a lab leak agenda!? You're out of your gourd bro.

So you're not going to answer the question either. My Trumpist sister sent me ton's of links to videos of the sort you are talking about. The real question is why would anyone trust Youtube for news? Again, what sources are trustworthy? Some rando on Youtube talking about a lab leak? The media covered a lab leak at the time and as we still don't even conclusively know where and how the Spanish flu broke out it will be some time before we understand covid. The crazy agenda your master came up with is only because there is a vacuum of information. The media that I follow covered it at the time and moved on. Your "media" continued to make shit up that wasn't there.

 

[MagentaLine]

So you're not going to answer the question either. My Trumpist sister sent me ton's of links to videos of the sort you are talking about. The real question is why would anyone trust Youtube for news? Again, what sources are trustworthy? Some rando on Youtube talking about a lab leak? The media covered a lab leak at the time and as we still don't even conclusively know where and how the Spanish flu broke out it will be some time before we understand covid. The crazy agenda your master came up with is only because there is a vacuum of information. The media that I follow covered it at the time and moved on. Your "media" continued to make shit up that wasn't there.

The internet is a vacuum of information only when the information isnt suppressed. Twitter has more news content than any hour news program....unless of course tweets are suppressed by pre Elon managements agenda.

 

[Bus Driver]

The internet is a vacuum of information only when the information isnt suppressed. Twitter has more news content than any hour news program....unless of course tweets are suppressed by pre Elon managements agenda.

You are probably of the opinion the suppression now being employed at Twitter is good.

 

[billy backstay]

This fits right here:

Here's the start of this BB. I commented about Manafort in prison. And cited it as "read and learn." You thought that was incorrect, I guess, and asked the above when it would not have taken you 20 more seconds to google it yourself with the handy link provided...............................

Sorry, I missed the link, my bad!!

I suggest you stop trying to "debate" with Thumpers, it is obviously elevating your BP!!

 

[veni vidi vici]

You are probably of the opinion the suppression now being employed at Twitter is good.

Obtuse…. and I am giving you the benefit of the doubt

 

[Steam Flyer]

Are you kidding? YouTube , owned by Google, didn't squash every covid video that didnr align itself when the pro vax not a lab leak agenda!? You're out of your gourd bro.

You must be looking at some alt-YouTube. The one I see has lots of anti-vax videos.

Now, it could be more subtle than that. It may be that Google assigned a big editorial staff to rigorously screen submissions, so they only publish the really stupid ones.

 

[Snaggletooth]

I suggest you stop trying to "debate" with Thumpers, it is obviously elevating your BP!!

 

[MagentaLine]

You must be looking at some alt-YouTube. The one I see has lots of anti-vax videos.

Now, it could be more subtle than that. It may be that Google assigned a big editorial staff to rigorously screen submissions, so they only publish the really stupid ones.

It does now.

 

[billy backstay]

I didn't refer to Trumpers as bunnies, BC did......

 

[Ishmael]

I didn't refer to Trumpers as bunnies, BC did......

You called them "Thumpers", Billy. Wake up.